Science Communication

Discovering new drugs is a long and expensive process

Chemical compounds that dupe screening tools make it even harder
Martin Clasby
By Martin Clasby
May 4, 2022

Modern drug discovery is an expensive and complicated process. Hundreds of scientists and at least a decade are often required to produce a single medicine. One of the most critical steps in this process is the first one – identifying new chemical compounds that could be developed into new medicines.

Researchers rely heavily on bioassays to identify potential drug candidates. These tests measure a compound’s ability to act on a biological target of interest. Candidates that show up as a “hit” by interacting with a target of interest (such as fitting into a binding site on the target) move on to further study and development. Advances in technology called high-throughput screening have allowed researchers to run thousands of compounds through bioassays in a short time, significantly streamlining the process.

But some of these “hits” don’t actually interact with the target as intended. And for the unwary researcher, this can lead down a rabbit hole of lost time and money.

I am a medicinal chemist who has been working in the drug discovery field for over 26 years, and one of the greatest challenges I have faced in my research is selecting good candidates from drug screening tests. One particular category of compounds, known as pan-assay interference compounds, or PAINS, is a common pitfall.

What are PAINS?

Bioassays involve placing a chemical compound together with the target of interest and measuring the strength of their interaction. Researchers assess interaction strength using a number of methods depending on how the bioassay is designed. A common assay design emits light when there is an interaction, where the intensity of the light depends upon the strength of interaction.

Unlike desired drug compounds that interact specifically with a target of interest, PAINS react nonspecifically with a wide variety of targets.

PAINS refer to compounds that often come up as false positives during the screening process. Because of certain characteristics of these molecules, they can interact with a target in nonspecific or unexpected ways. Some can even react chemically with the target. So while PAINS may come up as a hit in a screen, it doesn’t necessarily mean they actually do what researchers hoped they’d do. Common worst offenders include compounds like quinones, catechols and rhodanines.

There are a number of ways that PAINS dupe bioassays.

Some PAINS have properties that cause them to emit light (or fluoresce) under certain conditions. Since many bioassays detect light as a signal for a hit, this can confuse the assay readout and result in a false positive.

Other PAINS can act as redox cyclers in bioassays – producing hydrogen peroxide that can block the target and be misread as a hit.

Similarly, some PAINS form colloidal aggregates – clumps of molecules that interfere with the target of interest by absorbing it or modifying the molecular structure. In rare cases, these clumps can even elicit a desired interaction with the target of interest because of their large size.

Trace impurities left over from manufacturing can also elicit a PAINS response.

To make things even more complicated, because PAINS react with targets much more strongly than most compounds that are true drug candidates, PAINS often appear as the most promising hits in screening.

What can be done about PAINS?

An estimated 5% to 12% of compounds in the screening libraries academic institutions use for drug discovery consist of PAINS. Scientists misled by a false positive can waste considerable time if they try to develop these compounds into usable drugs.

Since researchers became aware of the existence of PAINS, medicinal chemists have identified frequent offenders and actively remove these compounds from screening libraries. However, some compounds will always fall through the cracks. It is ultimately up to the researcher to identify and discard these PAINS when they show up as false positives.

There are a few things researchers can do to filter out PAINS. In some cases, visually inspecting compounds for structural similarities with other known PAINS can be enough. For other cases, additional experiments are necessary to eliminate false positives.

Testing for the presence of hydrogen peroxide, for example, can help identify redox cyclers. Likewise, adding detergents can help break up colloidal aggregates. And bioassays that do not use light detection to register hits can circumvent PAINS that emit light.

Even the most experienced medicinal chemist needs to be cognizant of the dangers of these false positives. Taking steps to ensure that these types of compounds don’t make it to the next stage of drug discovery can avoid wasted time and effort and ultimately lead to a more efficient and cost-effective drug discovery process.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Martin Clasby
Martin Clasby

Martin Clasby is a research assistant professor of medicinal chemistry at the University of Michigan.

Get the latest from ASBMB Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Science

Science highlights or most popular articles

Here’s the latest good and bad news about COVID-19 drugs
News

Here’s the latest good and bad news about COVID-19 drugs

May 26, 2022

After vaccines, antivirals and a monoclonal antibody are the next line of defense.

Zinc is a metal essential to life
News

Zinc is a metal essential to life

May 25, 2022

Scientists have discovered a protein that helps keep cells alive when zinc levels are low.

The mechanism of the monkeypox antiviral
News

The mechanism of the monkeypox antiviral

May 24, 2022

As monkeypox becomes an international concern, interest grows in tecovirimat; this smallpox drug targets a structural protein that helps wrap the virus in a second lipid bilayer.

Researchers investigate self-regulation of an enzyme with critical cellular functions
News

Researchers investigate self-regulation of an enzyme with critical cellular functions

May 24, 2022

They found that one mechanism of CK1 activity, and thus one mechanism of regulation, is the self-phosphorylation of a conserved amino acid residue in its catalytic domain.

What is monkeypox?
Science Communication

What is monkeypox?

May 23, 2022

A microbiologist explains what’s known about this smallpox cousin.

A simple method to determine phase preference of proteins on live cell membranes
Journal News

A simple method to determine phase preference of proteins on live cell membranes

May 22, 2022

“The phase preference of molecules used to be difficult and time-consuming to establish. This new method, detected by chance, provides results in at most 15 minutes on live cells,” Thorsten Wohland said.