Journal News

MCP: Ovarian cancer’s dark signaling pathways

John Arnst
Jan. 1, 2018

Ovarian cancer is considerably rarer than lung and breast cancer, but it is the seventh-most common cancer in women, and in 2012, 239,000 new cases were diagnosed worldwide. The most common subtype of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma, or HGSOC, is also the most lethal, with a five-year survival rate of less than 40 percent despite high vulnerability to early treatment with chemotherapy.

This image from the 1905 text, “The diagnosis of diseases in women” by Findley Palmer, shows an adenocarcinoma of the ovary in which, according to the caption, “(t)he ovary is enlarged to the size of a child’s head.”
WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

The mortality rate is high largely because HGSOC tumors tend to shed small spheroids early and prolifically, spreading through the peritoneal fluid in the abdominal cavity to the pelvis and nearby organs. The spheroids, together with tumor-associated T cells and macrophages derived from nearby tissues and the circulation, then manufacture a microenvironment of signaling factors that promote cancer progression, immunosuppression and resistance to chemotherapies. This hostile bubble is maintained by obscure signaling mechanisms between the different cell types, and disrupting them with existing drugs may be a way to fight this notably aggressive form of cancer.

In a paper published in the journal Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, researchers at Philipps University in Marburg, Germany, have analyzed the proteome and transcriptome of the microenvironment of tumors in the abdominal fluid taken from women with HGSOC. Using state-of-the-art proteotranscriptomic techniques, the researchers have thrown light on the signaling networks and uncovered associations between factors expressed by the tumors and the likelihood of patient survival.

“We came up with a signaling map between tumor cells, macrophages and T cells,” said Rolf Müller, senior author on the paper, “and could now analyze and determine which cells secrete which mediators and on which cells these mediators act.”

Müller and colleagues previously had developed a signaling map based on the RNA, or transcriptome, expressed in tumor cells and related macrophages, but they wanted to expand their analyses to encompass the proteome and the aggregate of secreted molecules known as the secretome. Analyses of the transcriptome, proteome and secretome, Müller said, “all have their limitations on their own, (but) you can combine them to obtain something really meaningful.”

With a signaling map, Müller and colleagues were able to confirm several known signaling pathways and identify two new subgroups of macrophages, which they named B and G for their respective presence in patients with bad or good prognoses.

Müller and colleagues found that tumor spheroids and macrophages taken from patients with an estimated short survival time, based on the presence of additional factors, produced proteins that support remodeling of extracellular matrices and immunosuppression, which are both key for further cell proliferation. In contrast, macrophages taken from patients with an estimated longer survival time expressed cytokines linked to the activation and attraction of tumor-fighting effector T cells.

While clinical trials are still beyond the horizon, Müller and first author Thomas Worzfeld said they and their colleagues are interested in exploring the gamut of available pharmaceuticals that can interrupt the signaling within tumors as an alternative to disrupting extracellular communication pathways.

“There’s a drug to block almost any important intracellular signaling pathways nowadays,” Müller said, “and it would be interesting to see what the important signals are and on what intracellular signaling pathways the signals converge so that we can also block these interactions. That is something we really would like to work on in the future.”

Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
John Arnst

John Arnst was a science writer for ASBMB Today.

Related articles

From the journals: MCP
Courtney Chandler
From the journals: MCP
Inayah Entzminger
From the journals: MCP
Nuala Del Piccolo & Laurel Oldach
From the journals: MCP
Kian Kamgar-Parsi
From the journals: MCP
Nuala Del Piccolo

Get the latest from ASBMB Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Science

Science highlights or most popular articles

Living in a bubble
Annual Meeting

Living in a bubble

Sept. 29, 2022

This symposium, Protein Machines and Disorder, will be part of #DiscoverBMB 2023.

Keep your friends close and your RNAs closer
Annual Meeting

Keep your friends close and your RNAs closer

Sept. 29, 2022

This symposium, Regulation of RNA, will be part of #DiscoverBMB 2023.

A membrane ATPase without transporter activity
Journal News

A membrane ATPase without transporter activity

Sept. 28, 2022

A classic article in the Journal of Biological Chemistry reflects on Guido Guidotti’s laboratory and the search for CD39.

The era of “smart” organelles
Annual Meeting

The era of “smart” organelles

Sept. 28, 2022

This symposium, Organelles, Mechanisms and Phase Properties of Cellular Quality Control, will be part of #DiscoverBMB 2023.

Lipids, lipids everywhere!
Annual Meeting

Lipids, lipids everywhere!

Sept. 27, 2022

This symposium, Lipid Dynamics and Signals in Membrane and Protein Structure, will be part of #DiscoverBMB 2023.

A target to prevent kidney injury by chemotherapy
Journal News

A target to prevent kidney injury by chemotherapy

Sept. 27, 2022

“Many people don’t realize that the side effects of chemotherapy are not limited to hair loss, diarrhea and nausea.”