Blotter

NIH continues to investigate scientists’ foreign ties

133 found so far to have failed to disclose foreign affiliations
Sarina Neote
June 26, 2020

Michael Lauer, deputy director for extramural research at the National Institutes of Health, earlier this month gave a public presentation about the agency’s efforts to identify scientists with undisclosed ties to foreign governments. In his presentation on June 12, he reported that the NIH has investigated at least 189 scientists and found 70% of them in violation of NIH disclosure policies.

Lauer's presentation, which you can download here,  was for a working group of the NIH Advisory Committee to the Director on June 12. That panel, the Working Group on Foreign Influences on Research Integrity, was established two years ago to identify the best approaches for the agency and universities to ensure research security, facilitate collaboration with scientists across the globe, and safeguard American intellectual property. NIH's investigations began around the same time.

Since then, the NIH has been investigating hundreds of scientists in an attempt to root out those who are collaborating with foreign governments without informing the NIH. High-profile scientists, such as Charles Lieber of Harvard University, have been indicted on charges related to foreign influences to research integrity. Several have pleaded guilty to tax violations and other crimes.

Lauer said that the NIH has investigated 189 scientists at 87 institutions suspected of failing to disclose financial ties to foreign governments. Of those, 54 have either resigned or been fired. 

Finding Number (n = 189) Percentage
Undisclosed foreign grant 133 70%
Undisclosed talents award 102 54%
Undisclosed foreign company 17 9%
Peer review violation 9 5%
Any NIH violation 154 81%
Violation of institutional rules 70 37%
Termination or resignation 54 29%
Institutional removal from NIH system 77 41%
Source: National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research

The NIH has focused on addressing three primary concerns:

  1. Failure to disclose substantial foreign resources.
  2. Failure to disclose significant foreign financial conflict of interests and/or patents.
  3. Peer review violations.

In 93% of the 189 cases, the funding being scrutinized has come from China. The vast majority of scientists under investigation are Asian men in their 50s.

Lauer made the case, with data, that  the NIH is rarely wrong about whether an NIH-funded scientist has violated its policies on disclosure.

Frank Wu, a lawyer and president of Queen’s College, said that there is more to these numbers.

“Are the absolute numbers accurate? I have no doubt they are. The question is what is the denominator, and how do you control it? You can easily cause the number to go upward by eliminating those cases that were closed out early on.”

Lauer said there are an additional 399 scientists "of possible concern" to the NIH (separate from the 189 already investigated and discussed above) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation has looked into more than a third of them.

These investigations come amid growing concerns about China’s rising prominence in scientific research and development. Lauer said that 82% of those scientists being investigated are Asian and that Asians are targeted by China’s talent-recruitment programs.

Members of Congress and the Trump administration are looking to limit these threats in various ways, such as blocking student visas for Chinese graduate students and others. The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology has released a number of statements condemning such moves to restrict foreign workers.

Related stories

When relations with China worsen, science suffers: Legislation and a presidential proclamation aim to restrict student and research visas for Chinese graduate students.

Ex-Emory neuroscientist pleads guilty; fired Cleveland Clinic geneticist arrested: Department of Justice continues crackdown on scientists who fail to disclose ties to China’s Thousand Talents Program.

Protecting American science and its international collaborators: Lawyer and professor Frank Wu spoke about research integrity, legal cases against scientists and foreign influences on federally funded research.

FIRM Act would require some foreign scientists to register as foreign agents: If enacted, this legislation would affect some foreign scientists collaborating with U.S. scientists on federally funded research.

Lawmakers press FBI and NIH on research-integrity investigations: U.S. Reps. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Judy Chu, D-Calif., sent the NIH and FBI letters asking about the agencies’ investigations into scientists with ties to China.

Sarina Neote

Sarina Neote is ASBMB's science policy manager.

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

ASBMB responds to proposal for new health research agency
Blotter

ASBMB responds to proposal for new health research agency

July 27, 2021

Society recommends keeping funding for ARPA-H separate from that of other agencies and developing a unique strategic plan.

Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates?
Funding

Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates?

July 4, 2021

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration receives almost half its funding from companies it regulates, such as drug and medical device makers. Is this something you should be concerned about?

ASBMB calls for changes to Title IX policy
Blotter

ASBMB calls for changes to Title IX policy

June 16, 2021

Society urges Department of Education to revise rule created by Trump administration.

Rethinking the NIH review system
Reimagining

Rethinking the NIH review system

June 10, 2021

Proposals for change include a tiered grant funding system, tweaks to scoring and criteria, internal reviews and a continuous submission system.

Analysis: Mounting pressure on China about coronavirus ‘lab leak’ could backfire
News

Analysis: Mounting pressure on China about coronavirus ‘lab leak’ could backfire

June 9, 2021

Where the coronavirus originated remains a mystery, and the Chinese are bucking demands to let investigators see more.

Two years of the DOJ’s China Initiative
Blotter

Two years of the DOJ’s China Initiative

April 14, 2021

Despite the agency’s intense scrutiny of scientists at academic institutions, few have been convicted, and none has been accused of economic espionage.