Blotter

FIRM Act would require some foreign scientists to register as foreign agents

Sarina Neote
March 12, 2020

In late January, U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., introduced the Foreign Influence Registration Modernization Act, or the FIRM Act, to the U.S. House of Representatives. This bill would require people in pursuit of academic or scholarly work who represent foreign governments that engage in human rights abuses to register as foreign agents. If enacted, this legislation would affect some foreign scientists collaborating with U.S. scientists on federally funded research.

With this bill, Moulton seeks to amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, called FARA for short. That act was originally intended, as Moulton put it in an article in Time magazine, to “counter the rise of fascism in America as foreign operatives were spreading disinformation and propaganda.” FARA requires individuals who represent the interests of foreign powers in a political capacity or quasi political capacity to disclose their relationships with the foreign governments and register as foreign agents.

Moulton’s bill, meanwhile, is intended to modernize the disclosure requirements for foreign agents by digitizing the process; it also would narrow the definition of a foreign agent to an individual representing a foreign government, instead of “foreign powers.” In doing so, this act changes the exemption for scientists; under FARA, individuals in scholarly or scientific pursuit representing a foreign government do not have to register as foreign agents. But under the FIRM Act, any scientist representing a foreign government or receiving financial contributions directly from a foreign government that has committed human rights abuses would have to register as a foreign agent.

This would include any scientists who participate in foreign talent-recruitment programs, such as China’s Ten Thousand Program, which has been at the center of violations of research integrity. Moulton has insisted that “China has an all-out government effort to infiltrate our national security and education institutions.”

In recent years, several foreign researchers have failed to disclose funding they receive from China or have violated the confidentiality of peer review at the National Institutes of Health. The NIH has investigated at least 180 scientists at more than 65 institutions since 2018 for “violating policies requiring grantees to report their foreign ties.

The NIH has been working closely with the FBI to conduct these investigations and has referred several cases of alleged foreign influence in federally funded research to the FBI.

The FBI also has urged universities to review research conducted by Chinese scientists that could have defense applications. Since 2018, federal investigators have visited 10 institutions with a list of Chinese research institutions and/or companies for the university to monitor for research violations. The FBI also has been offering briefings to universities about foreign influences on scientific research conducted in the U.S.

The FIRM Act has been referred to the House judiciary committee. A month after the bill was introduced, U.S. Rep. Banks, R-Ind., co-sponsored the bill, indicating that the bill is gaining some traction. The judiciary committee will decide to whether to revise the bill or recommend a vote by the full House.

The ASBMB will continue track and report on the progress of this bill and other developments regarding foreign influence in U.S. scientific research.

Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Sarina Neote

Sarina Neote is ASBMB's director of public affairs.

Sign up for the ASBMB advocacy newsletter

Get the latest from ASBMB Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024
Annual Meeting

Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024

Feb. 7, 2024

Topics include running for office, becoming an advocate, and navigating the grant review process at the NIH.

NIH’s advisory committee releases report on re-envisioning postdoc training
News

NIH’s advisory committee releases report on re-envisioning postdoc training

Jan. 8, 2024

The working group developed six primary recommendations for the National Institutes of Health.

When authoritative sources hold  onto bad data
News

When authoritative sources hold onto bad data

Dec. 23, 2023

A legal scholar explains the need for government databases to retract information.

Can science publishing be both open and equitable?
Feature

Can science publishing be both open and equitable?

Dec. 14, 2023

An updated memo from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has researchers, funders and publishers looking ahead

ASBMB pushes federal agencies to help students struggling with loan debt
Funding

ASBMB pushes federal agencies to help students struggling with loan debt

Nov. 30, 2023

The society states that increasing student debt and financial strain are hurting the U.S. research enterprise and federal agencies must do more to ease this burden.

NIH diversity supplements offer a pathway to independence
Funding

NIH diversity supplements offer a pathway to independence

Nov. 29, 2023

These funding mechanisms have been underutilized. The ASBMB public affairs staff offers recommendations to change that.