Lawmakers press FBI and NIH on research-integrity investigations

Sarina Neote
Feb. 26, 2020

Prompted by concerns about racial profiling, U.S. Reps. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Judy Chu, D-Calif., last week sent the National Institutes of Health and the Federal Bureau of Investigation two letters about the agencies’ investigations into scientists with ties to China.

Cases of intellectual property theft and conflicts of interest have made headlines in recent years. There is also growing concern that innocent people, particularly those from China and those of Chinese descent, are being unfairly targeted by federal investigators.

Raskin and Chu requested the following documents and information in a letter to NIH Director Francis S. Collins on Thursday:

  1. Copies of letters that the NIH sent to 18,000 academic/institutional administrators asking them to be vigilant and a list of all recipients since August 2018.
  2. Descriptions of the 180 cases referred by the NIH to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General, including race/ethnicity and national origin of those under investigation, their institutions, whether the NIH or the FBI initiated the investigations, the status of the investigations and the outcomes of completed investigations.
  3. Copies of guidelines provided by the NIH to grantees about disclosures — such as the names and affiliations of foreign collaborators, foreign income and foreign awards.
  4. Copies of correspondence between the NIH and the FBI about investigations of people of Chinese descent.

In a second letter, addressed to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Raskin and Chu brought up several examples of Chinese-American scientists being wrongfully accused by the FBI and described the repercussions they suffered, such as losing their jobs, incurring significant legal fees and losing research funding.

Raskin and Chu pointed to news reports that the FBI has been encouraging universities to increasingly scrutinize Chinese-American faculty and researchers. They noted that university officials have complained that the FBI briefings have been “frustratingly vague.”

They asked the agency to provide the following:

  1. Descriptions of investigations and prosecutions involving theft or attempted theft of intellectual property (including demographic information, types of cases and actions taken).
  2. Correspondence with academic institutions related to monitoring Chinese researchers.
  3. Correspondence with the NIH about researchers of Chinese descent.
  4. Documents relating to the agency’s College and University Security Effort.
  5. All counterintelligence training materials related to people of Chinese descent.

Numerous cases of intellectual property theft and research-integrity violations since 2013 have involved members of the international scientific research community, including conflicts of interest and disclosure violations. All confirmed cases of research violation and intellectual property theft related to foreign influence have been a part of a larger, coordinated effort on the part of China, in particular China’s Thousand Talents Program.

In one case, a researcher downloaded thousands of files from one of the Department of Energy’s national labs and took them to China. In others, researchers did not disclose relationships (financial or otherwise) with Chinese research institutions or the Chinese government and used data from U.S. federally funded research to file patents in China.

In response, the NIH has expanded its integrity and oversight procedures to investigate foreign influence on extramural research. The agency has been working closely with the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and other nonfederal organizations to conduct these investigations.

While uncovering scientific espionage is vital to protect the American research enterprise and ensure the longevity of international collaboration, many Chinese-Americans and others of Chinese descent fear being wrongfully targeted based on their race. Furthermore, the research enterprise depends on international collaboration.

Transparent reporting requirements and guidance from federal funding agencies are needed to contend with academic dishonesty and espionage. However, though the FBI and NIH should investigate allegations of research-integrity violations, intellectual property theft and academic espionage, no single demographic should be targeted.

Sarina Neote

Sarina Neote is ASBMB's science policy manager.

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

Dalit scientists face barriers in India’s top science institutes

Dalit scientists face barriers in India’s top science institutes

Oct. 23, 2021

Despite decades-old inclusion policies, Dalits are systematically underrepresented in science institutes in India. Why?

A salary with strings attached

A salary with strings attached

Oct. 22, 2021

Here's what you need to know about postdoc payback agreements.

Land acknowledgments meant to honor Indigenous people too often do the opposite

Land acknowledgments meant to honor Indigenous people too often do the opposite

Oct. 22, 2021

Instead, they erase American Indians and sanitize history.

On-the-bench training

On-the-bench training

Oct. 20, 2021

Apprenticeships offer pathways into biotechnology for a growing number of students. How does the training model work, why are policymakers excited about it, and who wants to be an apprentice?

COVID immunity through infection or vaccination: Are they equal?

COVID immunity through infection or vaccination: Are they equal?

Oct. 16, 2021

As scientists argue whether a previous bout of covid offers the same amount of protection as vaccinations, people turn to the courts to decide.

Society news briefs: October 2021
Society News

Society news briefs: October 2021

Oct. 14, 2021

Find out everything that’s been going on lately with the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.