Due Diligence

Combating compression

Kaoru Sakabe
May 01, 2017

I love reading blog posts about what the next generation will never experience because of changes in technology. Isn’t it crazy that, at one point in time, data storage used to mean using floppy disks holding less than 1 MB? Or connecting to the internet involved using a phone line to dial into a server? Nowadays, cloud-based servers and online collaborative programs allow researchers to share large amounts of raw data quickly. External hard drives that can store terabytes of data can be purchased cheaply.

Read the entire collection

With the decreased cost of storing digital data and the ability to rapidly share files electronically, minimizing file size should no longer be a factor when deciding in what format to store your data. What you should keep in mind is that your electronic data should be stored in a universal format that does not alter its original information in any way, thus preserving your high-quality image data. In other words, you should be saving your files in a way that uses a lossless compression. For images, your go-to should be TIFF, or tag image file format, and not JPEG, or joint photographers expert group format. Although there are other lossless file types, such as RAW, BMP or PNG, ideally you should save as a TIFF, because it is uniformly supported across different software platforms.

Because disk space and transfer speed were great limitations many years ago, scores of authors chose to save their images as JPEG files. But beware: JPEG files can compromise your hard-earned data. Technically, JPEG is not a file format but rather a method that specifies how the image will be compressed. You will see the extension JPG or JPEG when you save files this way, but there is no difference between these two extensions. When an image is saved using JPEG compression, it is broken up into 8x8 pixel blocks, and a transformation then is applied to each block independently of the rest of the image to reduce the file size. This transformation also separates the color information from the brightness and discards more of the color information. Ultimately, JPEG is a lossy compression method (see the Due Diligence column in the January issue of ASBMB Today), which means that every time you save the file, you are discarding information. I’ll demonstrate the reasons why you should avoid this format, and hopefully I can convince you to avoid using JPEGs altogether.

First, saving as a JPEG fundamentally alters the image in a way that cannot be restored. Take, for example, the original TIFF image shown in Figure 1. In last month’s column, we discussed how informative histograms can be. Looking at the histogram of the TIFF image, we can see that the image contains many white pixels, some black pixels and a few pixels of various shades of gray. For JPEGs, high quality means little compression and a larger file size; low quality means high compression and smaller file size. Saving the same image as a JPEG at different quality levels introduces pixels that were not present in the original, creating a distorted image.

Figure 1. Saving your data as a JPEG changes the pixels in your image.Figure 1. Saving your data as a JPEG changes the pixels in your image.

Now how does this translate into a scientific image? In Figure 2, I’ve taken a TIFF image and saved it at three different JPEG qualities. Visually, there doesn’t appear to be a huge difference between the TIFF and the high-quality JPEG; however, if you analyze the image with a surface-plot analysis, you’ll notice appreciable differences between the two images. As you compress the image further, blocks start to appear, the background looks less like a real experiment and the bands seem pasted in. These artifacts occur especially in areas of high contrast, such as a dark band on a clean background.

(Left) Figure 2. JPEG compression introduces artifacts (Right)Figure 3. Repeatedly saving as a JPEG introduces artifacts.(Left) Figure 2. JPEG compression introduces artifacts
(Right) Figure 3. Repeatedly saving as a JPEG introduces artifacts.

Another issue is that each time a JPEG image is saved, the compression is applied. Repeatedly saving an image during editing can introduce artifacts. For example, in Figure 3, I’ve taken an image of a dividing cell and saved it 100 times at maximum quality. By the 100th save, several anomalies have appeared, and it no longer looks the same as the original. While this exercise is almost certainly an exaggeration of what’s happening in the lab, it illustrates that each time you save in the JPEG format, you are changing your data.

Finally, remember that by snapping the picture of the cell or scanning your film, you are recording the results of your experiment. Saving the image in a lossy file format, such as JPEG, distorts the actual results you obtained. Don’t get stuck assembling a figure with muddled data. By saving your image initially in a lossless format, such as TIFF, you will be doing your due diligence in preserving your data.

Kaoru SakabeKaoru Sakabe is the data integrity manager at the ASBMB.
Kaoru Sakabe

Kaoru Sakabe is the data integrity manager at the ASBMB.

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Science

Science highlights or most popular articles

When Taxol met tubulin
Journal News

When Taxol met tubulin

October 21, 2020

In the 1981 JBC paper “Taxol-induced polymerization of purified tubulin,” which was recently designated a JBC Classic, Nirbhay Kumar reported that the cancer drug was a valuable tool for cytoskeletal inquiries involving tubulin.

From the journals: JLR
Journal News

From the journals: JLR

October 20, 2020

The role of Myc and lipids in lung cancer, how accessible cholesterol contributes to spread of listeriosis and a new and improved way to study lipid rafts. Read about recent papers on these topics in the Journal of Lipid Research.

World Osteoporosis Day
Health Observance

World Osteoporosis Day

October 20, 2020

Here's a look at what osteoporosis entails and some recent findings on the subject.

The blueprint for life, neatly folded
News

The blueprint for life, neatly folded

October 18, 2020

Bit by bit, biologists are deciphering the complex 3-D — and 4-D — architecture of the genome and learning how all the squeezed-together stuff of DNA keeps itself in order. What they find could lead to medical advances.

How safe is the DNA in your poop from unwanted snooping
News

How safe is the DNA in your poop from unwanted snooping

October 17, 2020

Sewer systems can signal outbreaks of disease before they start. If you’re worried, poop is safe as long as it’s in the right hands

From the journals: MCP
Journal News

From the journals: MCP

October 16, 2020

Immune signaling in early-stage COVID-19, regulating translation on the ER membrane and reversing asparagine hydroxylation. Read about papers on these topics recently published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.