More thoughts on folding and form
We were pleased to read Sudha Neelam’s pleasant and stimulating essay, “The art of paper folding and the science of protein folding,”in ASBMB Today.
Outlining the similarity between an origami and a folded protein is quite popular, since in both the form combines beauty and functional relevance. In both cases, the mechanism of folding to achieve the final state is complex. This similarity has been taken further to highlight that a misfolded origami mimics in some way a misfolded protein seen at the onset of neurodegenerative diseases that develop via irreversible population of an amyloid state by extensive misaggregation.
European Bioinformatics Institute
We should, however, recall one difference between folding a paper sheet and a polypeptide chain, a difference that is of fundamental significance.
The complex course of action to fold a paper sheet to produce origami of a chosen shape demands that precise information be injected in the procedure by an operator (in this specific case, Nihkil, the son of the writer Sudha Neelam). The order of guided steps is essential to overcome the loss of entropy coupled to the creation of an ordered object, such as a classical origami sculpture.
In the case of folding a complex 3D structurestarting from one disordered polypeptide, the information guiding the series of events/chemical steps leading to the globular protein is imprinted within the amino acid sequence. The primary structure itself is also the code carrying the instructions on how to fold in water and thereby the information to overcome the huge, unfavorable entropy loss.
In water, the amino acid sequence of a protein conforms beautifully to Aristotle’s definition of substance, the intimate ensemble of matter and form (in Greek: “synolon”), insofar as the amino acid sequence contains in itself the reason for becoming what it is (in Latin: “substantia causa sui”). In this respect, we can compare the amino acid sequence to the marble block as seen by Michelangelo Buonarroti. In Michelangelo’s view, the artist need only bring into actuality the form that already lies in the marble block by chiseling away the superfluous material.
Likewise, as shown by Nobel laureate Christian Anfinsen, the amino acid sequence embeds from the beginning the properties that will characterize the protein in the final functionally competent native state, needing only water to pass from potentiality into actuality.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition monthly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles

Learning can be fun: Gaming anatomy and physiology
Instructors explore how gamification and active learning transform student engagement and retention. They convey how emotion, interaction and design can make even rigorous subjects more effective and memorable.

Mentorship and uncertainty: Lessons from Telemachus
A biochemistry educator reflects on mentorship through the Greek story of Telemachus, showing how embracing uncertainty, failure and curiosity can transform teaching.

Embracing the twists and turns along the educator pathway
A biochemistry educator reflects on the challenges of early faculty life, describing how evidence-based teaching, cross-disciplinary collaboration and classroom challenges shaped her growth.

Redesigning with students in mind
Assistant professor reflects on how the shift to online teaching revealed gaps in points-based grading and led to a redesign centered on transparency and student growth.

Teaching beyond information transfer
Educator reflects on moving beyond lectures to create a biochemistry classroom centered on engagement, transparency and student ownership, showing how small shifts like “student hours” and active learning can transform understanding.

Mayday! Lessons from cellular dysfunction and group work dynamics
An upper-level biology course revealed that strong science doesn’t guarantee strong teamwork. One instructor shares how failed group dynamics reshaped their approach, leading to more structured, collaborative and effective student learning.