Blotter

Congress passes, considers bills
promoting diversity in STEM

Sarina Neote
Feb. 19, 2020

While Congress is often characterized by partisan gridlock, late last year it passed legislation that creates and expands STEM education initiatives at the National Science Foundation, and it is considering a bill that would improve the quality of undergraduate STEM education at minority-serving institutions.

The Building Blocks of STEM Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump in December after rare bipartisan cooperation in both chambers, instructs the NSF to equitably allocate funding that supports greater inclusion in early childhood and elementary STEM education. With an eye to improving female participation in science technology, engineering and math, the act also directs the NSF to support research on the factors that discourage or encourage girls to engage in STEM activities.

Alejandro Barba on Unsplash
U.S. Capitol

The MSI STEM Achievement Act, meanwhile, directs the NSF to allocate funds for capacity building at tribal and historically black colleges and universities as well as minority-serving institutions. Based on a late 2018 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, which indicated minority-serving institutions are underutilized resources that can boost the nation’s science and technology workforce, this legislation would direct the Government Accountability Office to create an inventory of competitive funding programs that specifically target minority institutions to diversity the STEM workforce. The bill already has passed the House and is under consideration by the Senate.

The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology is a member of the STEM Education Coalition, which advocates for “targeted initiatives to promote the inclusion of underrepresented minorities, women, and other high-need populations in STEM fields.” Over the past year, the coalition has advocated for both of the bills.

While these two pieces of legislation are important catalysts for dialogue on what policies are needed to create institutional change to promote a diverse and inclusive STEM workforce, there is still more to this conversation—including sexual harassment in STEM, stereotype threats, and poor advising.

The ASBMB will continue to advocate for passage of the MSI STEM Achievement Act and other bills aimed at creating and supporting a diverse scientific workforce.

Sarina Neote

Sarina Neote is ASBMB's science policy manager.

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

ASBMB responds to proposal for new health research agency
Blotter

ASBMB responds to proposal for new health research agency

July 27, 2021

Society recommends keeping funding for ARPA-H separate from that of other agencies and developing a unique strategic plan.

Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates?
Funding

Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates?

July 4, 2021

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration receives almost half its funding from companies it regulates, such as drug and medical device makers. Is this something you should be concerned about?

ASBMB calls for changes to Title IX policy
Blotter

ASBMB calls for changes to Title IX policy

June 16, 2021

Society urges Department of Education to revise rule created by Trump administration.

Rethinking the NIH review system
Reimagining

Rethinking the NIH review system

June 10, 2021

Proposals for change include a tiered grant funding system, tweaks to scoring and criteria, internal reviews and a continuous submission system.

Analysis: Mounting pressure on China about coronavirus ‘lab leak’ could backfire
News

Analysis: Mounting pressure on China about coronavirus ‘lab leak’ could backfire

June 9, 2021

Where the coronavirus originated remains a mystery, and the Chinese are bucking demands to let investigators see more.

Two years of the DOJ’s China Initiative
Blotter

Two years of the DOJ’s China Initiative

April 14, 2021

Despite the agency’s intense scrutiny of scientists at academic institutions, few have been convicted, and none has been accused of economic espionage.