ASBMB recommends boost to NIH base budget

In written testimony, the society also made the case for NIGMS funds and sustaining the COBRE and INBRE programs
Sarina Neote
June 9, 2022

The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology submitted written testimony to a U.S. House subcommittee late last month in which it recommended a base budget of $49.05 billion for the National Institutes of Health, $3.25 billion for National Institute of General Medical Sciences and $430.5 million for a program supporting states with historically low levels of federal research funding.

The testimony — submitted to the House Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education on May 27 — both explained and made the case for curiosity-driven research.

“Solutions, treatments, therapies and cures are built on the foundational discoveries of basic scientific researchers. In addition, investment in basic scientific research drives long-term economic growth, induces a knowledge spillover effect, increases productivity and encourages more public–private collaboration,” the society wrote.

The ASBMB’s recommendation of $49.05 billion as a topline appropriation for the NIH would represent an increase of almost 8% over fiscal year 2022. In comparison, President Joe Biden’s proposed budget would increase NIH’s base budget by a mere $275 million.

“While we recognize that Congress has allocated a significant amount of emergency funding to the NIH to combat COVID-19, those supplements do not replace consistent, sustained year-over appropriations for the agency. We cannot be of a one-track mind here. We must continue to combat other serious diseases and public health threats as well,” the testimony said.

The society also explained that the NIGMS provides many training programs that help build a talented, diverse STEM workforce. The $3.25 billion that ASBMB recommended would represent a 5% increase. In light of inflation, the agency would have almost the same spending power as it did in FY22.

Finally, the society made the case for protecting the NIH Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program, which builds research capacity in states that have historically had low levels of NIH funding.

“The program has significantly broadened the geographic distribution of NIH funds for almost three decades,” ASBMB wrote, pointing to two particular awards that have been vital to establishing fundamental research excellence throughout the nation.

First is the Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence award, known as COBRE. It funds outstanding investigators and research facilities in the 23 states where the aggregate success rate for NIH applications historically has been low.

The second is the IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence program, known as INBRE, which funds research by undergraduates in the 23 states noted above. The ASBMB pointed to the Rhode Island INBRE as a success story.

“Rhode Island investigators turned 10 years of INBRE support into 21 awards from NIH and 28 awards from NSF and other funding agencies,” the testimony said. “Notably, the Rhode Island INBRE has trained more than 1,500 undergraduates — and 75% of those participants are now pursuing graduate degrees in biomedical fields or working in biomedical careers.”

Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?

Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.

Learn more
Sarina Neote

Sarina Neote is ASBMB's director of public affairs.

Sign up for the ASBMB advocacy newsletter

Get the latest from ASBMB Today

Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024
Annual Meeting

Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024

Feb. 7, 2024

Topics include running for office, becoming an advocate, and navigating the grant review process at the NIH.

NIH’s advisory committee releases report on re-envisioning postdoc training

NIH’s advisory committee releases report on re-envisioning postdoc training

Jan. 8, 2024

The working group developed six primary recommendations for the National Institutes of Health.

When authoritative sources hold  onto bad data

When authoritative sources hold onto bad data

Dec. 23, 2023

A legal scholar explains the need for government databases to retract information.

Can science publishing be both open and equitable?

Can science publishing be both open and equitable?

Dec. 14, 2023

An updated memo from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has researchers, funders and publishers looking ahead

ASBMB pushes federal agencies to help students struggling with loan debt

ASBMB pushes federal agencies to help students struggling with loan debt

Nov. 30, 2023

The society states that increasing student debt and financial strain are hurting the U.S. research enterprise and federal agencies must do more to ease this burden.

NIH diversity supplements offer a pathway to independence

NIH diversity supplements offer a pathway to independence

Nov. 29, 2023

These funding mechanisms have been underutilized. The ASBMB public affairs staff offers recommendations to change that.