ASBMB urges NIAID to prioritize DEAI
The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology sent recommendations March 30 to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on expanding the institute’s diversity, equity, accessibility and inclusivity activities.
The society recommended, broadly, that the NIAID expand the use of diversity and re-entry grant supplements and better support disabled, LGBTQ+ and other underrepresented scientists.
“Because NIAID is one of the largest NIH institutes, they have an obligation to lead the way in making the scientific enterprise more equitable and accessible,” Sarina Neote, public affairs director of the ASBMB, said. “All underrepresented groups face challenges that we have brought to the federal government’s attention, but we hope our recommendations will drive changes allowing the disabled and LGBTQ+ populations to feel more at home in the sciences.”
According to the National Institutes of Health, diversity supplements aim to “increase diversity in the research workforce by providing training, mentorship and career development opportunities to individuals who are underrepresented in biomedical, behavioral, clinical, social and basic sciences research.” However, less than 1% of NIAID’s R01 grants are associated with diversity supplements, causing them to lag behind other NIH institutes.
Therefore, the ASBMB recommended that NIAID “conduct targeted outreach to underrepresented communities and investigators who serve in them to disseminate necessary information on diversity supplements, including how to apply for them, and eligibility criteria.” In addition, the ASBMB said NIAID needs to clarify eligibility requirements for diversity supplements, including granting eligibility to underrepresented Asian groups.
Reentry supplements aid scientists who attempt to reenter the workforce after a prolonged leave due to childrearing, caregiving, sexual harassment and other circumstances. The ASBMB recommended NIAID offer additional re-entry and re-integration supplements and expand their advertisement. “There are many pathways leading into scientific careers and out of them; all these experiences from individual scientists create a diverse, fruitful, innovative research ecosystem,” the society wrote. “Providing more opportunities for individuals to re-enter the scientific enterprise will benefit the innovative pipeline.”
Disabled individuals face enormous obstacles while trying to pursue a scientific education or career, Neote said. Because the majority of lab spaces are not accessible, the ASBMB urged “the NIAID to conduct outreach to institutions serving students with disabilities in STEM, offer infrastructure supplements to update labs to be ADA accessible and meet the principles of universal design, and ensure that all program announcements are reaching every scientist, regardless of their disability status.”
The ASBMB also called upon NIAID to expand funding for disability research as a recent NIH-funded report identified health and health care disparities affecting people with disabilities, which will help institutions meet the needs of this often-forgotten population.
In addition, the ASBMB urged the NIAID to provide more support for LGBTQ+ and underrepresented scientists, including establishing outreach programs. To aid in NIAID’s efforts to expand these resources, the ASBMB recommended creating an action plan similar to the National Institute on Drug Abuse Racial Equity Initiative, partnering with NIH’s UNITE program and establishing partnerships with minority-serving and predominately undergraduate institutions.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition monthly and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024
Topics include running for office, becoming an advocate, and navigating the grant review process at the NIH.
NIH’s advisory committee releases report on re-envisioning postdoc training
The working group developed six primary recommendations for the National Institutes of Health.
When authoritative sources hold onto bad data
A legal scholar explains the need for government databases to retract information.
Can science publishing be both open and equitable?
An updated memo from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has researchers, funders and publishers looking ahead
ASBMB pushes federal agencies to help students struggling with loan debt
The society states that increasing student debt and financial strain are hurting the U.S. research enterprise and federal agencies must do more to ease this burden.
NIH diversity supplements offer a pathway to independence
These funding mechanisms have been underutilized. The ASBMB public affairs staff offers recommendations to change that.