More than 30 years ago, I was employed as the parish administrator of a church, a huge, crumbling building in an underserved area of Washington, D.C. The parish ethos was to make maximum use of the building by opening it up to neighborhood service providers.
I was in my early 30s, a young mother with a degree in liberal arts and a vague interest in improving the world. My boss, the rector, was about 10 years older, one of the first women ordained as a priest in the Episcopal Church. The parish staff was bare bones and the budget small.
One dank winter afternoon, the heat stopped working. Complaining phone calls came from the preschool and free clinic upstairs. Our resident custodian (referred to in Anglican-speak as a sexton) was AWOL, so the rector and I made our way into the bowels of the church basement to the furnace, an ancient behemoth squatting in a dark corner. It required the regular draining of something called a McDonnell & Miller valve, a bit of maintenance that had gone neglected. We wrestled the valve open and, as steaming rusty water gushed into a bucket (and onto our shoes), the rector sighed and gave me a deadpan look.
“Another thing they didn’t teach me in seminary.”
Which brings me to careers in biochemistry and molecular biology.
As an undergrad, grad student and (maybe) postdoc, you’ve learned a whole lot about science. But how much were you taught about having a career as a scientist? More to the point, how much were you not taught? How much knowledge did you have to pick up outside the lab — about choosing a career path, finding a job, starting a lab, or managing a budget and personnel?
You’ve probably learned a lot from your experience, which is, as they say, the best teacher. Would you be willing to share some of that hard-won knowledge?
The August issue of ASBMB Today traditionally is given over to the vast topic of careers. It’s an opportunity for society members to pool their collective wisdom and help each other with the stuff they really need to know.
Every career has its McDonnell & Miller valves. We’d like to hear about yours. Maybe you want to write an essay. Maybe you just have a few words of wisdom. Either way, drop me a line. Deadline for the August issue is June 3.
Join the ASBMB Today mailing list
Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.
Nicholas McCarty of New York University writes that genetically engineering drug users’ brains is short-sighted, reactive and unnecessary.
A pandemic hobby for her teenage son gets Sudha Neelam contemplating similarities in art and biology.
As a volunteer helping with the ASBMB certification exam, Brian Chiswell has learned valuable lessons he can put to work in his own classroom.
The world will be a different place next spring — a year after COVID-19 began to shutter much of the planet. Why not make this a time for rethinking structures in ways that are more sensible and just? We want your ideas for how to do that.