More than 30 years ago, I was employed as the parish administrator of a church, a huge, crumbling building in an underserved area of Washington, D.C. The parish ethos was to make maximum use of the building by opening it up to neighborhood service providers.
I was in my early 30s, a young mother with a degree in liberal arts and a vague interest in improving the world. My boss, the rector, was about 10 years older, one of the first women ordained as a priest in the Episcopal Church. The parish staff was bare bones and the budget small.
One dank winter afternoon, the heat stopped working. Complaining phone calls came from the preschool and free clinic upstairs. Our resident custodian (referred to in Anglican-speak as a sexton) was AWOL, so the rector and I made our way into the bowels of the church basement to the furnace, an ancient behemoth squatting in a dark corner. It required the regular draining of something called a McDonnell & Miller valve, a bit of maintenance that had gone neglected. We wrestled the valve open and, as steaming rusty water gushed into a bucket (and onto our shoes), the rector sighed and gave me a deadpan look.
“Another thing they didn’t teach me in seminary.”
Which brings me to careers in biochemistry and molecular biology.
As an undergrad, grad student and (maybe) postdoc, you’ve learned a whole lot about science. But how much were you taught about having a career as a scientist? More to the point, how much were you not taught? How much knowledge did you have to pick up outside the lab — about choosing a career path, finding a job, starting a lab, or managing a budget and personnel?
You’ve probably learned a lot from your experience, which is, as they say, the best teacher. Would you be willing to share some of that hard-won knowledge?
The August issue of ASBMB Today traditionally is given over to the vast topic of careers. It’s an opportunity for society members to pool their collective wisdom and help each other with the stuff they really need to know.
Every career has its McDonnell & Miller valves. We’d like to hear about yours. Maybe you want to write an essay. Maybe you just have a few words of wisdom. Either way, drop me a line. Deadline for the August issue is June 3.
Join the ASBMB Today mailing list
Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.
Severe scrutiny of two major papers, including one about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, is part of science's normal process of self-correction, explains Mark R. O’Brian.
As COVID-19 shuttered laboratories across the U.S., many researchers were forced to euthanize the animals they study. Lindsay Gray, a rodent surgeon in an animal research lab that faced this dilemma, argues here there is a safer, more effective way.
With male voices dominating the pandemic narrative, female scientists are lamenting the loss of diverse perspectives.
Jerry Hart, the ASBMB’s outgoing president, looks back at two years of big changes and advances at the society and in science.