A paleolithic peer review
You might think review panels have only been around for the last century or so. You would be mistaken. Archeologists recently discovered the following etched into the wall of a cave deep below the campus of Flintstone University, an R1 research institution.
Research Plan
Midday fatigue is a significant problem affecting the majority of our tribe, reducing our ability to hunt and gather effectively.

Our preliminary studies show that when goats eat the berries of plants in the genus Coffea, they become more energetic.
We hypothesize that coffee berries may be used to brew an energy drink for humans.
Our research plan will involve steeping the grinds from the coffee berry fruit or seed (or placebo) into heated water for 10 minutes. Samples will be blinded and consumed by age-matched participants. Energy levels of participants will be quantified 30 minutes later, assessed by how far each subject can run.
Unfortunately, the proposal was not discussed, delaying the discovery of coffee for many years. Here are the reviews:
Reviewer 1
- The premise is flawed as what happens in goats is not guaranteed to happen in humans.
- The PI has no experience grinding seeds.
- Water source is not specified.
Reviewer 2
- Leaves are already used to brew tea. Proposal lacks innovation.
- It is surprising that the PI did not determine whether goats are more energetic after consuming other foods.
- Only oral dosing is proposed. The PI should include alternate routes of administration.
Reviewer 3
- PI did not ensure that all participants would have equal leg lengths, complicating interpretation of the data.
- What if the alleged effects of coffee berries are not felt until 31 minutes postconsumption?
- Findings will have low impact: It is unlikely that most people would go to this sort of trouble when they could easily take a nap.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Opinions
Opinions highlights or most popular articles

Benefits of attending a large scientific conference
Researchers have a lot of choices when it comes to conferences and symposia. A large conference like the ASBMB Annual Meeting offers myriad opportunities, such as poster sessions, top research talks, social events, workshops, vendor booths and more.

When Batman meets Poison Ivy
Jessica Desamero had learned to love science communication by the time she was challenged to explain the role of DNA secondary structure in halting cancer cell growth to an 8th-grade level audience.

The monopoly defined: Who holds the power of science communication?
“At the official competition, out of 12 presenters, only two were from R2 institutions, and the other 10 were from R1 institutions. And just two had distinguishable non-American accents.”

How I made the most of my time as an undergrad
An assistant professor of biology looks back at the many ways he prepared (or didn’t) for his future when he was in college.

I find beauty in telling stories about giants
Andrea Lius wished she could find a focus for her scientific research — until she realized that what she really liked was talking to other scientists about the focus of their work.

Leveraging social media to share science
Scientist and educator Elisabeth Marnik explains how to combat misinformation, such as the popular myth that drinking bleach will prevent infections.