Funding

Two funding proposals

Michael R. Stallcup
By Michael R. Stallcup
November 01, 2018

One of the main problems facing all biomedical researchers these days (new and old ones alike) is that there are simply too many scientists applying for too few dollars. Changing the number of scientists who apply for funding is difficult to address, and a huge increase in the budgets of federal funding agencies does not look likely in the near term. But there are some things that could be done to make more funding available to researchers within the current budgets of federal funding agencies.

Currently, federal agencies will allow principal investigators to pay for up to 95 percent of their salaries from grants. If the percentage of salary that could be obtained from federal grants and contracts were to be limited to, say, 50 percent, this would make more funds available for the actual research and would, in effect, make universities and other research institutions take more responsibility for the salaries of their employees. A gradual implementation of such a policy over several years would allow the research institutions to make adjustments and avoid the adverse impact of a fast transition.

Another problem more specific to researchers in biochemistry and molecular biology is the difficulty in getting funding for basic research that has no obvious translational potential in the near term. I think this problem can be solved only by creation of new National Institutes of Health study sections with a mandate to review basic research. Currently, much of the basic research is crowded into a few study sections or sent to study sections that place a premium on translation.

Michael R. Stallcup
Michael R. Stallcup

Michael R. Stallcup is a professor of biochemistry and molecular medicine at the University of Southern California.
 

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

ASBMB joins amicus brief
Blotter

ASBMB joins amicus brief

August 26, 2020

Society and other nonprofits raise concerns about racial profiling by federal investigators and prosecutors’ attempts to criminalize administrative errors.

Science-related legislation to watch
Blotter

Science-related legislation to watch

August 19, 2020

One bill would provide $26 billion in emergency funding for agencies that support research; another would protect against foreign influence in research.

We are here because we choose to be
Editorial

We are here because we choose to be

July 23, 2020

Five months into a pandemic with arguably the world’s worst response, the United States can no longer take the easy way out and blame only politics for our downfall. We’re to blame, too.

NSF foreign influence probes net nearly two dozen
Blotter

NSF foreign influence probes net nearly two dozen

July 15, 2020

Meanwhile, feds charge Ohio State researcher with fraud and drop theft charges against Emory professor.

U.S. seeks to kick out and ban foreign students
Blotter

U.S. seeks to kick out and ban foreign students

July 08, 2020

Harvard and MIT sue government to stop rule change targeting F-1 and M-1 visa holders at or heading to institutions offering only online courses this fall because of COVID-19.

NIH struggles to address sexual harassment by grantees
Blotter

NIH struggles to address sexual harassment by grantees

July 01, 2020

While the agency has made progress with intramural cases, it has been less successful with extramural ones.