Your voice does matter
In June, the Public Affairs Advisory Committee urged all members of the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology to contact their congressional representatives about three pieces of legislation that would broaden participation of underrepresented groups in STEM.
These bills direct federal agencies to increase opportunities for underrepresented minorities, women and veterans pursuing degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. They improve transparency and accountability of existing programs that aim to broaden STEM participation. While this sounds bureaucratic, increased transparency is necessary to evaluate and improve these programs and ensure they are an effective use of taxpayer dollars.
All told, ASBMB members sent almost 800 messages to members of Congress in support of the legislation. You educated your representatives on the issue, and two of the three bills gained nearly a dozen additional co-sponsors from seven states.
Eight hundred is an impressive number, but with some 10,000 ASBMB members, we had hoped for more.
Politics in America today can leave anyone feeling exhausted. A deep partisan divide and bitter political discourse might make you think advocacy is a waste of time.
I understand why you’d feel that way.
Issues such as tax cuts, abortion rights and immigration are now so deeply partisan that your lawmakers’ stance seems predetermined by whether there is a “D” or an “R” next to their names. They seem to have no flexibility to consider an alternate view. This can make you question the value of those advocacy campaigns that ask you to “click here to send a letter to your representative.”
All is not lost, however, if you back away from hot-button topics and focus on less risky and divisive issues that are vital to the scientific community, such as investments in research, STEM education policies and legislation focused on improving and diversifying the scientific workforce. On these topics, you — as a subject matter expert — can have an effect and nurture support by educating your member of Congress.
Grassroots advocacy does work. A 2017 report by the Congressional Management Foundation found that direct constituent interactions have more influence on lawmakers’ decisions than other advocacy strategies. The report stated that citizen advocates “are more influential and contribute to better public policy when they provide personalized and local information to Congress.”
Emily Hulobowich, executive director of the nonprofit Coalition for Health Funding, agrees. “There’s an old saying in Washington: If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu,” she told me. “Lawmakers must hear directly from those they care the most about — their constituents — about their priorities and concerns to move issues forward. If constituents aren’t willing to speak loudly and often, it’s unlikely their priorities and concerns will rise to the top of the agenda.”
We want to engage more ASBMB members in future advocacy campaigns. We know you’re busy going to class, conducting research, teaching and applying for grants. We know your time is valuable, and this may not be a top priority for you.
But if you didn’t get involved this time because you think it won’t make a difference or you believe your representatives won’t listen, we want you to know that they hear you; we saw that with the added co-sponsors following our spring campaign. Advocacy works, and representatives are listening. Don’t assume others will deliver the message for you. Make sure your voice is heard.
Join the ASBMB Today mailing list
Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.
ASBMB recommends that Congress provide an additional year of funding for students and early-career researchers whose grants expired in 2020 before they could complete their training and/or research.
Over the past four years, the Trump administration made it increasingly difficult for students from other countries to study in the United States. President Joe Biden’s election signals a new day for international education.
The recent arrest of an MIT engineering professor has once again drawn attention to the role of China in the U.S. science and technology system.
One spring 2020 report found that 38% of students at four-year universities were food-insecure in the previous 30 days.