Blotter

'Universities, and we faculty,
have roles to play as beacons of tolerance and inclusion'

Jonathan Sachs
By Jonathan Sachs
November 15, 2016

Astoundingly to some, we are living in a world that is markedly different than it was a week ago. We have already seen countless examples of hate crimes across the country, both in and outside of academic settings. At my own university, for example, a Muslim student association billboard was defaced days before the election, and at others there have been widespread reports of assault and intimidation of underrepresented minorities.

Universities, and we faculty, have roles to play as beacons of tolerance and inclusion, and some in our community are shaken. The question has become what to do. As a small start, my colleagues and I reached out to our lab members and undergraduate students. Like other professors around the country, we wrote emails to the students and staff in our labs reasserting the scientific community’s stalwart commitment to inclusion and tolerance. We also brought up the topic at the start of our undergraduate lectures last week, letting students know that we are here for them and that they deserve to feel safe and respected at all times. I encourage you to do the same.

sachs-primary.png
T. Chick McClure on Unsplash
 

In my molecular biology class, it was clear that the expression of support provided a modicum of relief for students. One undergraduate responded in an email to me that same day: “As a minority, especially female, I’m really grateful that you spoke up to encourage diversity and show solidarity. It makes me feel safer on campus.”

However, the threat to the safety of targeted groups in our community may soon require far more than offering reassuring words. As academic scientists, we need a collective plan of action to ensure that our labs are places for scientific discovery, and not prejudice or intolerance. Taking a proactive stance may not come easily. Unlike our colleagues in the social sciences and humanities, we’re less accustomed to engaging head-to-head with societal crises. However, the emergence of unveiled racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia  and demeaning language, and the very likely deportation of millions of people, threatens to undermine the talent we foster in our labs and the cohesion of the academic environment.

In my opinion, the time is now to band together in our rejection of bigotry and intolerance in all forms. Emails from our leaders (like this one) are important and helpful. In the coming weeks, we must also determine concrete actions that will unify the scientific community against hate and lend our collective strength to other efforts underway across the country. Part of those efforts must be a willingness to hear perspectives that are different from our own experiences, whether liberal or conservative, and to have the courage to have meaningful conversations aimed at understanding one another’s points of view instead of characterizing diverse perspectives as “right” and “wrong.” If we have any hope of moving past this anxiety, the path lies in open communication.

Many of us will be understandably concerned about what the new president and Congress will mean for the funding of science. I have faith that the ASBMB Public Affairs Advocacy Committee will remain steadfast in the fight to promote basic science research funding over the coming years.  I also have faith that the PAAC will advocate to ensure a healthy environment in which scientific discovery can thrive.

So what can we as a community do, right now, to prepare for what lies ahead? Can we establish a new nationwide campaign of tolerance and unity that gathers the voices of every scientific society in the country? What would that entail? What would that look like? Scientific societies should consider raising funds and spending them in ways that would further enhance the opportunities for minority groups within our societies, for example by promoting conference attendance and organizing programs geared for career development and networking. I would be eager to hear additional constructive suggestions for how to proceed (here, in the comments section) and will look forward to working with you in the coming weeks to establish an actionable path forward. As scientists, we have a powerful voice, and we must use it.

Sachs was inspired by the statement put out by ASBMB reaffirming our commitment to diversity and inclusion.  

Jonathan Sachs
Jonathan Sachs

Jonathan Sachs is a professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Minnesota. He is a member of the ASBMB Public Affairs Advisory Committee.

Join the ASBMB Today mailing list

Sign up to get updates on articles, interviews and events.

Latest in Policy

Policy highlights or most popular articles

U.S. seeks to kick out and ban foreign students
Blotter

U.S. seeks to kick out and ban foreign students

July 08, 2020

Harvard and MIT sue government to stop rule change targeting F-1 and M-1 visa holders at or heading to institutions offering only online courses this fall because of COVID-19.

NIH struggles to address sexual harassment by grantees
Blotter

NIH struggles to address sexual harassment by grantees

July 01, 2020

While the agency has made progress with intramural cases, it has been less successful with extramural ones.

What the Supreme Court's DACA ruling means for undocumented students and the colleges and universities they attend
News

What the Supreme Court's DACA ruling means for undocumented students and the colleges and universities they attend

June 27, 2020

At least for now, hundreds of thousands of students can stay in school without facing new hardships.

When leaders choose self-interest over science, the consequences are deadly
Editorial

When leaders choose self-interest over science, the consequences are deadly

June 26, 2020

As a result of the Trump administration’s actions and inaction, Ben Corb writes, the U.S. was late to adopt a testing protocol to help track and slow the spread of COVID-19.

NIH continues to investigate scientists’ foreign ties
Blotter

NIH continues to investigate scientists’ foreign ties

June 26, 2020

The agency has investigated 189 scientists suspected of violating NIH policies and has found a majority of them guilty of failing to disclose foreign affiliations.

Bill would reform NSF and plant innovation hubs nationwide
Blotter

Bill would reform NSF and plant innovation hubs nationwide

June 17, 2020

The Endless Frontier Act would rename, add a directorate to and pump up to $100 billion in new funding into the agency. It also would fix the uneven distribution of jobs and capital concentrated now in just a few cities.