January 2012

2012 through our crystal ball


As the calendar flips from 2011 to 2012, we in the Public Affairs Office reflect on the year that was and try to predict the year that will be. Unfortunately, Carnac the Magnificent refused to take our calls, and predicting politics in this era of partisanship is about as easy as particle physics. First, a brief look at what Washington did, and didn’t, do in 2011:

Congress: The 112th Congress has, to date, seen 54 bills signed into law by President Obama. By comparison, the 111th Congress had 383 bills signed into law by Obama. Of course, in the 111th, Democrats controlled the U.S. House and Senate; whereas, in the 112th, Republicans control the House. The last time there was a Democratic president and the House switched to Republican rule was after the Republican Revolution of 1994, with Newt Gingrich as speaker of the House of the 104th Congress and rival President Clinton in the White House. As contentious as that time was, Congress still saw 333 bills signed into law. The track record of the 112th Congress is atrocious, and both parties are to blame. The House continues to pass legislation so extreme there is no chance of it passing the Senate, let alone being signed into law by the president, and the Senate does…well, the Senate doesn’t do very much.

Budget: Congress, in one of its last actions of 2011, managed to pass a budget for fiscal 2012. The good news is that agencies that fund biomedical research like the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health saw increases. The bad news is the NIH increase was modest and well below the president’s request. Additionally, Congress authorized creation of a translational science center at NIH, a central pillar in NIH Director Francis Collins’ 2011 activities.

The not-so-super committee: Things got so bad in Washington when our (ahem) “leaders” brought the nation to the brink of default for the fi rst time in our 228-year history that Obama established a “super committee” of 12 members of Congress (equally divided by party and chamber) to put politics aside and do the heavy lifting the full Congress was unable to do. They were tasked with developing a plan to cut $1.5 trillion in spending over the next 10 years. After 111 days, the committee disbanded, having failed to come to a bipartisan agreement.





First Name:
Last Name:

Comment on this item:
Our comments are moderated. Maximum 1000 characters. We would appreciate it if you signed your name to your comment.


There aren't any comments on this item yet. Tell us what you think!


Page 1 of 1

found= true1622